Unfortunately, though, the Board has historically been criticized for falling short of accomplishing this primary responsibility.
Howard Griffith: “Unfortunately, though, the Board has historically been criticized for falling short of accomplishing this primary…”
Editor's note · Context
Griffith highlights past criticisms of the Chemical Safety Board's effectiveness.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
We keep hearing that it is not a rule and it is not a regulation and that kind of stuff. I just ask if it is not a rule, does that mean it is not enforceable, and does that mean it can be repealed by the next administration with a click of…
I am not against States' rights. I am against creating a super State in California because they are the only ones that are entitled to get a waiver and then claiming, as the Government Accountability Office, that they have some kind of…
Let me be clear: I meant no offense and no criticism. As the gentleman from the other side of the aisle and from New Jersey knows, I love parliamentary procedure. One of the reasons that we have parliamentary procedures and rules of…
Point of parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Miller of Illinois). The gentleman from Virginia will state his parliamentary inquiry.





