But you would agree that any good lawyer has been wrong at some point in time as to what the courts might do, would you not?
Editor's note · Context
Griffith emphasizes the unpredictability of court decisions.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
I appreciate that. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I will say, the reason I raise that issue is because what we have in this rule is really just a different form of the classic motion to lay on the table or to…
Last night the Rules Committee met and reported out a rule for one measure, H.R. 27, the HALT Fentanyl Act, under a structured rule. The rule provides for 1 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority…
By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 282 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 282 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to…
Point of parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Miller of Illinois). The gentleman from Virginia will state his parliamentary inquiry.





