If the gentleman will continue to yield for an additional question, Mr. Speaker, I would ask the gentleman, it is his understanding that we would take that up later, but that means that the bill that we previously passed--the language that we previously passed, at least--no longer exists based on the Senate amendment; am I correct in that assumption?
Howard Griffith: “If the gentleman will continue to yield for an additional question, Mr. Speaker, I would ask the gentleman, it is his…”
On the recordFebruary 27, 2015
Share
More from Howard Griffith
Apr 1, 2025
I believe the gentleman is referencing a Member by name, and I don't believe that is proper.
Dec 17, 2024
Mr. O'Neill, the Virginia attorney general, Jason Miyares, is looking into ActBlue and whether online fundraising entities are following Federal law.
Apr 30, 2025
May I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. McGuire). The gentleman from Virginia has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from New Jersey has 8 minutes remaining.
Feb 26, 2025
Let me be clear: I meant no offense and no criticism. As the gentleman from the other side of the aisle and from New Jersey knows, I love parliamentary procedure. One of the reasons that we have parliamentary procedures and rules of…





