I thank the gentleman for yielding. In committee, I raised issues of unconstitutional takings in H.R. 3. Ninety-five percent of gross revenues are taken from a manufacturer unless they agree to the price the government offers. It is not negotiation. It is an offer you can't refuse. It is confiscatory. Accordingly, it is unconstitutional. But you don't have to believe me. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service says H.R. 3 likely violates the Fifth and Eighth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Mr. Chair, I took an oath to support the United States Constitution when I entered this body. To support the Constitution, you must vote ``no'' on H.R. 3. To fix drug pricing, you should vote ``yes'' on the Walden amendment in the nature of a substitute.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
When debating this resolution, H.J. Res. 35, is it appropriate to discuss superfluous matters to the matter at hand currently on the floor? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under clause 1 of rule XVII, remarks in debate must be confined to the…
When Hurricane Helene hit, the County of Pulaski was designated a couple of days before the city of Radford for FEMA assistance, and the people of Fairlawn were told that they were not in Pulaski but in Radford, so they couldn't get…
I rise for a parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state the inquiry.
I would point out that, while you mentioned Elon Musk, who is a U.S. citizen, you did not mention George Soros, who also is a U.S. citizen, but both of those have given money.





