On the recordSeptember 7, 2011
But I am correct that that reconsideration process has actually been objected to by certain groups and the courts. Is that not true?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Griffith questions the legality of the EPA's reconsideration process.
Share & report
More from Howard Griffith
Feb 6, 2025
Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman of the committee for yielding me time. My colleagues on the other side cry: Action, action. However, in February of 2025, there will be no action unless we pass H.R. 27, the HALT Fentanyl Act. Mr. Speaker…
Dec 17, 2024
Madam Speaker, I thank Mr. Weber for yielding to me to say a few words about my friend, Dr. Michael Burgess. First, I rise to congratulate you. You are finally graduating from Congress. You have done a great job during your two decades…
Feb 5, 2025
Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Republican Conference, I offer a privileged resolution and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 107 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is…
Apr 1, 2025
Mr. Speaker, are there any points of order that properly lie against this resolution we are currently debating? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentleman inquiring about the rule which he is managing?
Other voices in this conversation
