At what point will the United States House of Representatives stand up and say we aren't going to take it from the executive branch anymore? I say to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, this is not about Democrats versus Republicans; this is about Congress versus the executive branch. If the executive branch had a problem with the subpoena, they should not have filed a motion to quash. They should have taken it to the third branch of government and made sure that the subpoena was proper. They didn't do that. They decided to be executive across the board to dictate to this House, elected by the people, what the terms were going to be. I won't stand for it anymore. It is time we used our inherent contempt and hold the Attorney General in contempt of Congress. Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
I thank the chairman of the committee for yielding me time. My colleagues on the other side cry: Action, action. However, in February of 2025, there will be no action unless we pass H.R. 27, the HALT Fentanyl Act. Mr. Speaker, I rise today…
I would point out that, while you mentioned Elon Musk, who is a U.S. citizen, you did not mention George Soros, who also is a U.S. citizen, but both of those have given money.
We keep hearing that it is not a rule and it is not a regulation and that kind of stuff. I just ask if it is not a rule, does that mean it is not enforceable, and does that mean it can be repealed by the next administration with a click of…
Parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman from New York yield for a parliamentary inquiry?





