On the recordNovember 1, 2017
And now that you have had time to research it and think about it, are you in a position today to explain the 3-year delay?
Source
congress.govHoward Griffith: “And now that you have had time to research it and think about it, are you in a position today to explain the 3-year…”
Editor's note · Context
Griffith questions the delay in explaining the MOU for lab inspections.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
Apr 30, 2025
We keep hearing that it is not a rule and it is not a regulation and that kind of stuff. I just ask if it is not a rule, does that mean it is not enforceable, and does that mean it can be repealed by the next administration with a click of…
Apr 30, 2025
May I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. McGuire). The gentleman from Virginia has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from New Jersey has 8 minutes remaining.
Apr 30, 2025
May I inquire as to the time remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. Foxx). The gentleman from Virginia has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from New Jersey has 6 minutes remaining.
Apr 30, 2025
Point of parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Miller of Illinois). The gentleman from Virginia will state his parliamentary inquiry.
Other voices in this conversation
