And it is also our job then to review those laws to determine whether or not we believe it in the best interest of the United States and if the public believes that there is something we should do that we should change it which is why the Founding Fathers gave us a 2-year time and not a lifetime term.
Editor's note · Context
Griffith asserts the importance of reviewing laws for public interest.
Share
More from Howard Griffith
Are there any points of order that properly lie against this resolution we are currently debating? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentleman inquiring about the rule which he is managing?
When debating this resolution, H.J. Res. 35, is it appropriate to discuss superfluous matters to the matter at hand currently on the floor? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under clause 1 of rule XVII, remarks in debate must be confined to the…
I include in the Record a letter of support for H.J. Res. 35 from the United States Chamber of Commerce, a letter from the National Federation of Independent Businesses, and last, but not least, a letter from the American Petroleum…
If WinRed is doing something to make it easier for foreign actors to donate by having massive numbers of small donations sent in, more than happy to look into that; as well as ActBlue.





