And so while I know they weren't thinking about it or they probably didn't mean to go that far, it shows you that even if we modified it, it won't work for the people. Jobs would be eliminated, jobs will be cut, and we really won't have any impact on the environment unless we go the full bore, in which case, we no longer have air to breathe and we won't have to worry about the global temperature in 20 years or 30 years or 40 years, because none of us will be here. And it is just fascinating to me how they can get the science so messed up and, yet, lecture to us about the science.
On the recordMarch 25, 2019
Share
More from Howard Griffith
Dec 17, 2024
Mr. O'Neill, the Virginia attorney general, Jason Miyares, is looking into ActBlue and whether online fundraising entities are following Federal law.
Feb 6, 2025
I thank the chairman of the committee for yielding me time. My colleagues on the other side cry: Action, action. However, in February of 2025, there will be no action unless we pass H.R. 27, the HALT Fentanyl Act. Mr. Speaker, I rise today…
Apr 1, 2025
I believe the gentleman is referencing a Member by name, and I don't believe that is proper.
Feb 26, 2025
When debating this resolution, H.J. Res. 35, is it appropriate to discuss superfluous matters to the matter at hand currently on the floor? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under clause 1 of rule XVII, remarks in debate must be confined to the…





