I will comment that this debate is about priorities. The priority here is the overriding priority of providing for our national defense which is not only an obligation, it is a constitutional obligation, and this amendment would strike at the heart of our ability to perform that responsibility. O&M accounts, personnel accounts are exempted under this amendment which means that it falls even more heavily on all the other accounts in the Department of Defense and it would be an onerous, intolerable burden and would indeed, even though it does not come under my Readiness subcommittee, be a tremendous detriment to the status of readiness of our military forces. This amendment deserves resounding defeat.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of an amendment on national defense and military readiness.
Share
More from Herbert H. Bateman
I also rise to express my strong support for the recommendations of the conference committee with respect to our military forces. It is the responsibility of every Member of Congress to provide our military forces with the necessary…
This bill has elicited a great deal of rather passionate and emotional debate. As important as the subject matter is, I think there has been more passion and more emotion than the bill, by its terms, certainly warrants. It is a bill that…
I rise today in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts. To suggest that supporters of this amendment are being disingenuous in their comments on the amount allocated for national defense in the budget…
Mr. Chairman, I guess the bottom line here is that we often get embroiled in these formula debates here in the House. And I have heard some seemingly convincing arguments on the other side enumerating the number of States that would…





