I will comment that this debate is about priorities. The priority here is the overriding priority of providing for our national defense which is not only an obligation, it is a constitutional obligation, and this amendment would strike at the heart of our ability to perform that responsibility. O&M accounts, personnel accounts are exempted under this amendment which means that it falls even more heavily on all the other accounts in the Department of Defense and it would be an onerous, intolerable burden and would indeed, even though it does not come under my Readiness subcommittee, be a tremendous detriment to the status of readiness of our military forces. This amendment deserves resounding defeat.
Herbert H. Bateman: “I will comment that this debate is about priorities. The priority here is the overriding priority of providing for our…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of an amendment on national defense and military readiness.
Share
More from Herbert H. Bateman
It is truly an honor to represent this outstanding segment of the community in Congress.
I would say to the gentleman he is correct. It is written so as not to exclude the possibility of Slovenia.
Mr. Chairman, I remind my colleagues that there is a world of difference between not exceeding which is a floor, not a ceiling. I would further remind my colleagues that everything they have heard on behalf of this bill or this amendment…
I agree with those who believe that the House of Representatives has no constitutional authority to censure or reprimand a President in the course of deliberations with respect to the issue of impeachment of that President





