Gerry Connolly

If FedRAMP isn't working the way we want it to work and it needs some adjustment in resource availability, we're certainly willing to look at that in the draft legislation.

I'm looking at this, thinking, are we that disconnected from, in a sense, our client base, right?

We cannot pretend it is all the same; France favoring Jefferson in the 1800 election is no different than Russian interferences.

Codifying it gives you some predictability, gives Federal employees who work on the program, you know, an anchor to guide them.

I happen to believe, and I think Mr. Meadows does as well--I don't want to speak for him, but--right now, the problem is FedRAMP is potentially an orphan.

I think through automation and also transparency--I think the metrics reporting and being able to track over time...

But, on the other hand, what does it entail, from your point of view?

One of your recommendations to us was a power agency authorization instead of the JAB.

Thank you so much. And your praise of our draft bill, you also should be promoted and given a big, fat raise.

And that's millions of dollars and multiple years for a medium-sized, maybe small-to medium-sized business, and that's maddening to people.

That's right. I just wanted to clarify what you were not saying.

I want to give you a chance to be very clear. You're not arguing JAB is just no different than any other Federal agency.

I wish we could give you a promotion and a raise. Thank you so much, Congresswoman Lawrence.

That's true, Mr. Cheriyan, but that doesn't let us off the hook.

Would my friend yield just for a second?

Mr. Chairman, I hope my colleagues will not be lulled into the false argument that what happened in 2016... is the same.

The integrity of our election process is at stake, and this committee has yet to speak to it.

My motive is to protect the integrity of the American electoral system. It is not to play politics.

To support the amendment that is going to be offered by Mr. Burchett is essentially to whitewash history.

Russia's unprecedented interference in the 2016 Presidential election should trouble every American and every member of this committee.

The Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome through hacking and distributing stolen information in 2016.

As an American, I have a right to protest, because it's being done in my name and I don't agree.

If there's one basic value that ought to unite us as Democrats and Republicans, as Americans, it is how we treat children.

They're not to be treated as subhumans. This is not an American way of dealing with the stranger who comes and seeks succor.

Woman, I am sad my good friend, who I know shares my concerns, feels the need to oppose an amendment that is designed to prevent a very bad thing from happening that has no rationale, has no supporting documentation, and has threatened…