if I can follow up because the comments of the gentleman from North Carolina are indeed impressive, is there something about, and this is what troubles me from my side, is there something about an attorney or an individual who misbehaves with one of those cases and incurs sanctions that would differ from somebody, regardless of their background, regardless of their race or age or sex or anything else in any of the other areas where we apply the ``shall'' provision, which is what the amendment does, instead of the ``may'' provision, which is what the gentleman wants to preserve for these particular issues?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legal sanctions during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
I think there are a number of circumstances, particularly when civil rights, religious organizations, political campaigns, and other important things are being involved in surveillance, that there ought to be somebody not representing the…
The original intent being that which is held to be yours and reasonably expected to be for privacy must be returned to privacy.
Thank you, L.F., for giving me and Loretta the chance to report to the membership on FMC's largest and most important domestic program, Congress to Campus. Loretta, who is a good friend, and I had the opportunity to actually participate in…
I think the PATRIOT Act went off track in not defining some of the areas that set parameters around government gathering data.





