Political Quotes

On the recordApril 18, 2002
However, I must strongly oppose the motion to accept the Senate language here, because to do so would be irresponsible. The fact of the matter is that while there are certainly people here who are in need of assistance, it is definitely not the case that everybody that the Senate language would cover would fit into that category, and it is also not the case that the people that would be covered are as described by the gentleman. For example, he refers to tax-paying legal residents. Well, it is not a requirement under the Senate language that the individual have ever paid a penny in taxes in order to receive these benefits. It only requires that they have been in this country as a lawful, permanent resident for 5 years.
Said by
Bob Goodlatte
Republican · Virginia

Editor's note · Context

Opposing the Senate language regarding benefits for legal residents during a House Committee debate.

Share

More from Bob Goodlatte

Jul 18, 2022

the more opportunities that the consumer has to decide for themselves whether or not they want to make certain information available to Google or other companies and control how Google might utilize that information, the better.

congress.gov
Jul 18, 2022

The original intent being that which is held to be yours and reasonably expected to be for privacy must be returned to privacy.

congress.gov
Jul 18, 2022

I think a great first step would be to pass the Fourth Amendment's Not For Sale Act that's been introduced by Chair Nadler.

congress.gov
Jul 18, 2022

I think the PATRIOT Act went off track in not defining some of the areas that set parameters around government gathering data.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation