Reclaiming my time, no, I am only making a case that if a code is put on the product by the manufacturer, the Congress, the people should not be questioning the reason for doing that by allowing the removal of that code for various reasons, one of which is tracing products that may have been adulterated and need to be recalled, may have defects and need to be recalled, products that may be used by law enforcement, may be discovered at the scene of the crime and can trace a crime. There is no compelling argument why somebody should be able to pull the code off the product and continue to sell the product without having that kind of consumer protection. That is why the National Consumer League supports the bill.
Bob Goodlatte: “Reclaiming my time, no, I am only making a case that if a code is put on the product by the manufacturer, the Congress…”
On the recordSeptember 28, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of product codes for consumer protection and law enforcement.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
Jul 18, 2022
I think the more choices the consumer has in terms of how they can control or access their information...
Jul 18, 2022
Right, but the sale of the information to the government puts the government in the picture as well and the Fourth Amendment is directed at the government not obtaining information without showing probable cause, without providing a…
Jul 18, 2022
The more opportunities that the consumer has to decide for themselves whether or not they want to make certain information available to Google or other companies and control how Google might utilize that information, the better.





