I will clarify a point that the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Stenholm) is interested in. Let me state that the projects authorized by title IV are primarily scientific efforts, and scientific methods should be the primary means of assessing them. While we encourage multiparty monitoring, it is not our intent to require it, particularly for projects conducted under title IV.
Bob Goodlatte: “I will clarify a point that the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Stenholm) is interested in. Let me state that the projects…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the scientific assessment of projects authorized by title IV.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
The more opportunities that the consumer has to decide for themselves whether or not they want to make certain information available to Google or other companies and control how Google might utilize that information, the better.
I think that antitrust laws definitely should be utilized to promote competition.
I think a great first step would be to pass the Fourth Amendment's Not For Sale Act that's been introduced by Chair Nadler.
I would call attention to something we haven't talked much about here today, and that is the fact that, when the FISA court issues warrants allowing for the surveillance of various parties that are brought to the attention of the court…





