Orrin Hatch

It would be difficult to be more wrong than the recommendation I just described.

It is far past time that Congress and the President act to right our fiscal ship.

We must repeal the flawed SGR system--in my opinion, an albatross around the Congress's neck that must be addressed at the end of every year.

We have all said we want to work towards repeal of the SGR formula. However, a main problem we face is, what do we do then?

Are doctors being educated at all on the people using dietary supplements as well?

But you agree with me on that.

I want to thank all four of you for being here today. I have been listening very carefully, and I want to compliment you, Mr. Hamm, for having the guts to do what you have done.

I would like to see everybody subscribe to this around a number like 19 percent as a starting point for our debate.

You can go broke easier in your business than almost any business I know, and I just want to compliment you for what you have been able to accomplish and the guts that you have had to get the things done.

You are preaching to the choir here. It was the Hatch-Lieberman bill that brought the rates down to begin with.

A number of tax policy experts believe that the tax system should simply be used to raise the revenue necessary to fund a constitutionally limited Federal Government and not get involved in social engineering through the code.

The real question that we have is, should we have any of these tax expenditures or deductions in lieu of the fact that we might reduce corporate tax rates low enough so that that would take care of it?

I agree with you entirely that we should have a neutral tax code. That is the purpose of comprehensive reform, as I see it.

I agree with you on the intangible drilling and development cost deduction. It has been a tremendous benefit for the oil industry, at least the independent oil industry in this country.

I think it is a pipe dream of some outsiders who think that, in this complex economy, that any business organization, let alone the U.S. Congress, can follow that philosophy.

It is essential that we continue these discussions in pursuit of reforming a tax code which is complicated, unfair, and difficult to administer.

I withhold. I yield the floor. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Connecticut.

That is my point as well. Thank you.

I think that is one of the reasons why I am very interested in programs that would encourage the non-residential fathers of these children to stay involved.

The United States must have a strong social safety net, and it is not just for the sake of having one.

Our Nation is only as great as the least among us.

I think there are issues here. And we could do something at the Federal level to do something about these work requirements.

I would like you to comment on that statistic. And also, do you believe it was the intention of members of Congress and President Clinton that, in over a decade and a half since welfare reform, more than half the welfare caseload would be…

Can you comment on what these 'other' activities are and what challenges for policymakers are presented by having so much of the TANF expenditures unknown?

Leaders cannot lead if they are hungry. Inventors cannot invent if they are homeless.