why would we take away transparency on body-worn cameras?

I believe, having done oversight and accountability in prior jobs and now here on this committee, that publicly available body camera footage is a good thing.

I believe that we would be, by moving this forward, repealing important protections for people that should, frankly, have bipartisan support.

Why would we be supporting a measure that allows it so that people criminally convicted for assault on the job could get back onto the force?

I appreciate that, and we will be--I am brand new to the Congress but have seen excellent work from Abigail Spanberger and Ro Khanna and Mark Pocan and others on trying to figure out how we can support both the DOJ's work but also USDA's…

Let's make sure that even on a sometimes uneven playing field of corporate concentration, that they can still make it.

I appreciate how at the beginning of your remarks today you laid out how in the past there has been this view of get big or get out that has really hurt our consumers and our small farmers and small ranchers.

We appreciate your consideration of the immense positive impact SNAP has on the lives of millions of Americans as well as its beneficial impact on the national economy and our nation's long-term financial sustainability.

the false narrative that I think needs to not be constructed is that we shouldn't help folks when they are in need.

cutting workers and services, like Lynn's, would not serve the American people, but it would serve those corporate interests

There is this false presumption that I think is talked about here in Congress that government spending always necessarily equals inflation, and my understanding is that that is just wrong.

it is really important for us to highlight the amazing Federal employees that are doing the right thing for this country