Whenever we are imposing a cost on Americans, you have to directly link it to a benefit, and that benefit is very clearly not there in this case.

It's very problematic. There's a reason I'm not defending it.

Well, I can tell you if the entirety of the OECD countries, all developed countries stopped emitting tomorrow and we all went back into the Stone Age, do you know how much we would reduce the temperature by the year 2100? Point four…

I mean let's look at the total EV subsidies in the IRA, almost $400 billion when you actually account for probably what is going to happen in the next 10 years.

I would love to put them out of business. I guess we are on the same page there.

What do we think this multihundreds of billions of dollars of investment, what do we think it is going to do for our climate? This is just a cost-benefit question.

So because we are talking about subsidizing rich people so they can buy a Tesla. That is what we are talking about.

There is a social cost of energy and security. It is a massive social cost.

I want to tell a story...

It's a simple but positive step in the right direction and I hope this committee will include this policy in the NDAA.

Eighty-five percent of APIs are from foreign countries. Sixty percent of our finished dose forms are from foreign countries.