How do we prioritize where we look and how lead service line replacement actually gets sought out?

I think the clean drinking water and making sure that lead is not infused with lead drinking water is certainly something we can agree on.

It sounds like we don't know, and, I mean, that is the short answer.

Is there anything in this bill that would stop limitless and endless surveys and wasting all that money?

the reality is, is that there is nothing in this bill that prioritizes communities with the highest lead readings or homes in the oldest housing stocks.

I don't think there is a lot of guardrails in place.

I always want to preface everything we say we want to get to the same goal, a reduction in global carbon emissions.

Maybe we should rethink this.

If we don't address the permitting issues in this country, which are far more stringent than most developed nations, we are never going to get to the part where we build 120 percent more transmission lines in America.

One of the things we see of course is weaponization of the court system.

The clean energy goals are directly in conflict with the environmental groups as well because they are the ones who sue and settle.