I wish it were as simple as the gentleman suggests. But it is important to realize this amendment would literally reduce almost every program in the CDFI. And remember, these funding cuts would devastate some of our Nation's most distressed populations, including Native Americans and people with disabilities, people in rural communities. So I urge my colleagues to vote ``no.'' I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Duffy). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Dan Crenshaw: “I wish it were as simple as the gentleman suggests. But it is important to realize this amendment would literally reduce…”
On the recordJuly 6, 2016
Share
More from Dan Crenshaw
May 12, 2025
The problem with this narrative is that there's no reason to have that fear… I am sorry that so many people on the left and in the media have lied to you about what's in this bill.
Dec 18, 2025
The scary part about that analogy is that it is actually a lot less troubling to lose an eye than it is to completely change your gender. Completely changing your gender is a far more invasive procedure than losing an eye. Trust me, I know.
Dec 18, 2025
I will just ask a simple question, because the statement was made that all the science suggests that these procedures are medically necessary. Can they cite their sources? Show me the studies. I cited mine. Cite their sources.





