CHARLES A. GONZALEZ
The Public Record
American politician
I do not think you are going to have a debate that English proficiency is something that I think enables and empowers individuals.
What Mr. King's bill tries to do is not protect the English language, but to encourage us to have some basic commonality of communication.
I have never understood the motivations of those who believe either our country or our language needs to be 'protected' by a law like H.R. 997.
I hope that there will be a bipartisan bill introduced, obviously, in the Senate in June that will overhaul wartime contracting practices, and that we in the House will act accordingly and support our Senate colleagues.
Many of the most vocal complaints about the first decade of this century centered around the practice of granting billions of dollars in no-bid contracts, especially during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I actually see that we are ignoring things that are systemic that took over a number of years to develop in this country.
Do you agree that consumers have a protectable right as to who has access to their information and how it is used?
I don't see that this Congress or any previous Congress has ever been paralyzed by changing technology.
I support the building of the pipeline, and I also believe that given the proper timelines to look at all factors that eventually this application will be approved with recommendations.
I don't believe that this bill is the best method of accomplishing the building out of the Keystone Pipeline, which I support.
None of you are that important that you can't disclose what you are doing as a public business.
I think that Commissioner McGahn said, you know, people coming in through the back door. Well, with Citizens United and such and the relaxation in my opinion based on judicial decree, we don't have to come, a lot of people don't have to…
I believe that paying someone else to donate for you is illegal and with this proven disclosure loophole, how do we know that foreign nationals haven't illegally contributed too?
Regulating campaign finance is FEC's reason for existence and requires the Commissioners' full attention.
I think it is important for the sake of trust just in government and the election process and such that what you do to the extent that can be public is transparent.
We have seen a consolidated effort by States across the country to enact laws which will deny thousands if not millions of Americans of the constitutionally protected right to vote.
First, I fear that as health inflation rises, the cost of private plans will outgrow the government premium support.
This is the United States of America. We're not some other Third World country.
Rather than favoring the EPA on this decision, the responsible thing to do is to figure out the past program.
I am really worried that the printed media is really faced with a do or die situation that may encompass what we may have found objectionable in a different setting years ago.





