last year I said when we have projections, and I think the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Minge) is going to talk about projections in a minute, that no reasonable business person in this country that I know of would spend 80 percent of a 10-year projection on anything. That is what we were asked to do last year with that $800-some billion tax bill. We are for tax cuts, but to obligate 80 percent of a 10-year projection? I do not know what the price of cotton and soybeans is going to be next week, and these people in Washington try to talk about 10 years like it is real money. It is not even here yet.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over the fiscal responsibility of a proposed tax bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Tanner
I consider this a sad day for our institution here when a Member comes to the floor and, by name, calls other Members to task for an unsubstantiated, untrue, fabricated allegation made in a blog somewhere and stands behind the fact that it…
Mr. Speaker, on September 14, 1960, President Eisenhower signed legislation into law, creating real estate investment trusts. House Resolution 1595 celebrates the 50th anniversary of REITs, as they are called, and the enhanced…
I rise today in support of H. Res. 1337 to acknowledge the difficulties facing many Tennesseans as a result of the severe weather that struck our area recently. Sadly, the storms that hit our area took seven lives in the 19 counties that…
According to the GAO in fiscal year ending 2004, 16 of 23 Federal agencies, and 19 of 24 in fiscal year ending 2005, according to the GAO, couldn't produce a clean audit. I wish I had made this up, but I didn't. It would be easier to…





