Thank you, Mr. Scott. I too have, as Mr. King said, enormous respect for the Ethics Committee. It's a job that none of us ask for and none of us want, but it has to be done to protect the House of Representatives. As a lawyer, I also believe in precedent. And I have searched this record and find no activity involving moral turpitude or any activity that could be classified as one with criminal intent. Therefore, I think an appropriate action that would protect the House as well as punish Congressman Rangel would be a reprimand. I think that is the appropriate punishment commensurate with what has occurred here, unfortunately.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the Ethics Committee's role and suggests a reprimand for Congressman Rangel.
Share
More from John Tanner
On August 5, 2010, 10 unarmed humanitarian aid workers affiliated with the International Assistance Mission... were brutally killed in Badakhshan province, Afghanistan. There were six Americans among the murdered aid workers. These brave…
I don't have or didn't have a closer friend in Congress than Paul Gillmor. He was not only an extraordinarily talented individual who made people comfortable around him, but he also had a leadership quality that I observed up close and…
Let me thank Congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee for introducing this resolution, which condemns the recent vicious and deadly assault on African Union forces. On September 29, 2007, an estimated 1,000 members of a heavily armed group of…
trade is not a political issue; trade is an economic issue. The economics of this agreement are such that Peru, if you voted for the Andean trade preference, already has access to our markets without regard to tariffs and duty. This is the…





