I think the same thing may well turn out, here.

Do we need to have American military boots on the ground fighting Qadhafi forces?

I think there are legitimate concerns that people on both sides of the aisle have.

I do have concerns about mission creep.

So we've had zero discussions about our involvement in building democratic institutions post-Qadhafi, whenever that occurs?

I hope the congressional schedule won't be used again as a discussion point.

If you break it, you own it.

So we started this no-fly zone to make it a fair fight, and my understanding is we're pulling out our A-10s and our AC-130s now.

Would it be good to--before committing U.S. troops and military action and money--would it be good to sort of know more fully who it is we are coming to the aid of?

It seems like it would be a very important answer if we are having serious dialogue with the United Nations over committing forces there.

Are there potentially other extremist groups that are coming into the area to fight against Qaddafi that may in fact be the very people we dislike greatly?

Does the administration believe that if we are going to have a military effort of any kind in Libya, that we need a declaration of war by Congress?