I would be happy to hear the majority leader's answer. My guess is, if I understand the Senator's question correctly, that they don't have an interest in school construction. They don't really have an interest in some of the amendments we are trying to offer here. They would prefer not to have to vote on them, because oftentimes these amendments are critical to school districts back home. So I don't blame the majority leader for trying to avoid having some of these tough votes. Maybe if I were in that position, I would, too. But the fact is that they are critical issues directly confronting education. We have an education bill pending. We have a tax bill pending, and the last time a circumstance similar to this occurred when we were in the majority, we let the Republicans offer 52 amendments. So that is really the essence of the question before us. Do we have a good debate about issues that are directly relevant to this bill or not? So far, the Republicans have refused us that debate. According to that chart, we are now in day 10. I yield the floor.
Thomas Daschle: “I would be happy to hear the majority leader's answer. My guess is, if I understand the Senator's question correctly…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of debate on education amendments during Senate floor proceedings.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
Well, Senator Coburn, I believe that a top-down review is essential. I would start with that. I think it is very, very important for us to understand what the problems are before we try to make the system better.
One is defining our issues as clearly as we can. And before we can ever get to the solutions of healthcare, we have to make sure that we are all on the same page with regard to the problems of healthcare.
I think that the cost of the status quo, the cost of doing nothing may be the most expensive option of all.
Providing as high a quality of life as we can guarantee is a critical goal for us as we look at health reform and as it pertains especially to the disability community.





