I want to speak briefly on a matter we will probably have the opportunity to discuss in greater detail at a later time. That has to do with the nomination of Bradley Smith to be a Commissioner on the Federal Election Commission. The President has made this nomination with the greatest reluctance. He delayed it for many months while fending off hard lobbying on behalf of Mr. Smith by my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. In the end, the President forwarded this nomination to us, acknowledging the Republican leadership's strongly held view that, under standard practice for FEC appointments, each party is entitled to have the President nominate its choice for a Commission seat allocated by law to that party. I understand the President's decision. He did what he believes that he, as President, was required to do, notwithstanding his concerns about the suitability of Mr. Smith. Now we, as Senators, must do what we are required to do by the Constitution--to consider this nomination on the merits.
Thomas Daschle: “I want to speak briefly on a matter we will probably have the opportunity to discuss in greater detail at a later time.…”
On the recordFebruary 28, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Bradley Smith to the Federal Election Commission.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
Jan 7, 2009
One is defining our issues as clearly as we can. And before we can ever get to the solutions of healthcare, we have to make sure that we are all on the same page with regard to the problems of healthcare.
Jan 7, 2009
Providing as high a quality of life as we can guarantee is a critical goal for us as we look at health reform and as it pertains especially to the disability community.
Jan 26, 2009
It seems to me to make a lot of sense that there should be a Federal health board that has some oversight responsibility.
Jan 7, 2009
Our health care system is broken, and fixing it is one area where I hope the 80-20 rule comes into play.





