This resolution assumes that a reconciliation bill will be triggered that will violate the Byrd rule unless it is terminated at the end of 2002 or else subsequently offset. The assumption of the resolution is that tax cuts will sunset in the year 2002 or be offset by tax increases thereafter in order for it not to be in violation of the Byrd rule, is that not correct?
Discussing the implications of a resolution related to tax cuts and the Byrd rule.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
We have cost problems. We have access problems. But as you rightfully point out in your question, we certainly have quality problems.
Our health care system is broken, and fixing it is one area where I hope the 80-20 rule comes into play.
Immunization is probably as sound an investment as we can make in good health.
Other voices in this conversation
