On the recordApril 13, 2016
If it is good enough for the United States military to trust change on that front, why shouldn't it be good enough for the rest of the country, from the standpoint of looking at security?
Source
congress.govMarshall Sanford: “If it is good enough for the United States military to trust change on that front, why shouldn't it be good enough for…”
Editor's note · Context
Sanford questions the necessity of the Jones Act for national security.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
Aug 9, 2023
It shows the danger of Donald Trump in my mind, because what it says is somebody as highly elected as Kevin McCarthy will twist himself in knots to stay relevant with the Trump base.
Mar 5, 2025
I think it's going to be disastrous. You know, people go down to the local bank because it sends signals that there's stability there. And what the president right now is doing both domestically and internationally, is sending a signal…
Jul 24, 2018
We now have a Republican Party that is muted and silent on the issue of a bailout package which is what is being proposed in consequence to the tariffs that the administration itself imposed.
Jul 24, 2018
If this were a Democrat, if this were a President Obama or President Hillary Clinton, would there be more outrage by Republicans voiced? I assume the answer would be yes?
Other voices in this conversation
