No. One, it's not believable given the degree to which the Trump administration last go round, over which I overlapped a couple of years, incessantly talked about the market and what it was doing next.
Sanford argues against the credibility of the current administration's view on market volatility, referencing past behavior of the Trump administration.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
I, humbly, 100 percent totally disagree with you on that one. I mean, if you look at the baseline over the next ten years, we're talking about $86 trillion of spending, right?
The idea of Canada being a national security threat is something that doesn't make a whole lot of sense in anybody's book.
It shows the danger of Donald Trump in my mind, because what it says is somebody as highly elected as Kevin McCarthy will twist himself in knots to stay relevant with the Trump base.
We now have a Republican Party that is muted and silent on the issue of a bailout package which is what is being proposed in consequence to the tariffs that the administration itself imposed.
Other voices in this conversation
