And, basically, what it said is that none of us have any legal claim whatsoever to our own Social Security money. So this whole issue of private property rights, the issue of owning our own account, seeing a monthly statement, knowing to the penny how much is there, I think, is very, very important.
Discussing the implications of the Supreme Court decision Fleming v. Nestor on Social Security rights.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
Time will tell. I mean, that was the statement of my opponent last night. This is the party of Donald J. Trump and I could not more vigorously disagree.
I thank the gentleman for his work on this bill. I thank the gentlewoman from Nevada for her work on this bill. It is a bipartisan bill because it makes commonsense. So whether it is DeFazio or Blumenauer or Duffy--go down the list of…
That which has traditionally worked in GOP politics isn't so much working these days. I've seen this erosion, you have too.
No. One, it's not believable given the degree to which the Trump administration last go round, over which I overlapped a couple of years, incessantly talked about the market and what it was doing next.
Other voices in this conversation
