But in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision, they have also held in a different version a separation of church and States than the one that you voted for. The Supreme Court said that we could not practice openly and freely religion in the schools. You are right. We have as a body the opportunity to say, no, you are wrong. We are going to pass the constitutional amendment protecting the freedom of religion. It had nothing to do with shutting down the freedom of speech or religion.
Marshall Sanford: “But in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision, they have also held in a different version a separation of church and States than…”
On the recordJune 18, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing a Supreme Court decision on the separation of church and state and its implications for religious freedom in schools.
Share
More from Marshall Sanford
Jul 24, 2018
In a trust-based political system, the idea that you institutionalize lying is a real problem.
Jan 2, 2023
This is going to be a thankless job, for whoever gets it. I mean, you do not have a governing majority.
Jul 24, 2018
We now have a Republican Party that is muted and silent on the issue of a bailout package which is what is being proposed in consequence to the tariffs that the administration itself imposed.
Jul 24, 2018
If this were a Democrat, if this were a President Obama or President Hillary Clinton, would there be more outrage by Republicans voiced? I assume the answer would be yes?





