Marshall Sanford: “This amendment would leave it up to you all basically to decide on how those resources might shift. All it does is…”

I think it's going to be disastrous. You know, people go down to the local bank because it sends signals that there's stability there. And what the president right now is doing both domestically and internationally, is sending a signal…

Wouldn't it make sense to again enact that repeal for a longer time period so that more aid at a lower cost could go into Puerto Rico?

Time will tell. I mean, that was the statement of my opponent last night. This is the party of Donald J. Trump and I could not more vigorously disagree.

I thank Chairman Shuster for agreeing to the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Sanford). The amendment was agreed to…