As long as they're dangerous, I hope they all die in jail if they're going to go back and kill Americans.

It's 31 percent. How does that strike you? Is that high, low, about right?

I'm pretty sure that in your brief, you argued that the executive branch should not have the ability to hold an enemy combatant indefinitely.

I have decided to apply my general policy disagreement with respect to those enhancements, at least, that is, the computers and the number of images.

I think you're doing it wrong and every judge who does what you're doing is making it easier for the children to be exploited.

I hope you go to jail for 50 years if you're on the internet trolling for images of children and sexual exploitation.

I think the best way you deter crime when it comes to child pornography is you lower the boom on anybody who goes on the internet and pulls out these images for their pleasure.

I have said in the past that I think it's good for the Court to look like America, so count me in on the idea of making the Court more diverse.

Everyone deserves a lawyer. You're doing the country a great service when you defend the most unpopular people.

The attacks from the left against Judge Childs was really pretty vicious, to be honest with you.

I hope you can give us an answer because it shouldn't be hard. Either you do or you don't.

I remember Janice Rogers Brown, an African-American woman. It was filibustered by the same people praising you.

There is a periodic review process made up of an interagency, where they go through the files of these folks and they determine whether or not they still present a threat to the United States or the world at large.

So the answer would be, no?

The American people deserve a system where everybody is represented whether you like them or not.

I think that every Federal judge out there should make it harder for somebody to go on a computer and view this filth.

Elections have consequences. He had many qualified African-American women to choose from. He chose you.

I think it's time to look at this system anew, folks.

I want people to go to jail who do that, because you're feeding the beast.

Is it your view that we can hold enemy combatants as long as they're a threat to the United States?

This is a new game for the Supreme Court, and this game is particularly disturbing to me.

I just want you to understand that it's important for all of us to know where you were coming from.

The reason I mention it is because in one of the briefs, you argued that the executive branch doesn't have that option.

So we're still in a state of war with certain elements of radical Islam to this very day?

Everybody deserves a lawyer. You're doing the country a great service when you defend the most unpopular people.