Lindsey Graham

These were five people that we had in our control that are now helping the Taliban run the country. As an American, does that bother you?

I think the best way you deter crime when it comes to child pornography is you lower the boom on anybody who goes on the internet and pulls out these images for their pleasure.

I hope you go to jail for 50 years if you're on the internet trolling for images of children and sexual exploitation.

If she's confused about what happened, some people on the other side had an accusation against Judge Kavanaugh that during high school he sexually assaulted somebody.

I have decided to apply my general policy disagreement with respect to those enhancements, at least, that is, the computers and the number of images.

So just keep an open mind. That's the only thing I ask you to do.

It is not rational to take the venue of choice of child pornographers--the computer that have 85 million images on it--and not consider that feeding the beast.

Expedited removal is a creature of Congress, folks, and if you've been here 2 years or less the statute...

So the answer would be, no?

To me, putting somebody in jail for using a computer is more of a deterrent than supervising their activity of watching the computer.

I want people to go to jail who do that, because you're feeding the beast.

I think that every Federal judge out there should make it harder for somebody to go on a computer and view this filth.

I think you're doing it wrong and every judge who does what you're doing is making it easier for the children to be exploited.

I would never do that to you. If I had some information that's sketchy at best that somehow you've done something wrong, I promise you just from human decency I would share it with you.

I agree, it was powerful.

So we're still in a state of war with certain elements of radical Islam to this very day?

If family mattered, we would not have done to her what was done to her here in the United States Senate.

I just want you to understand that it's important for all of us to know where you were coming from.

You don't agree with that, do you?

As long as they're dangerous, I hope they all die in jail if they're going to go back and kill Americans.

Is it your view that we can hold enemy combatants as long as they're a threat to the United States?

I think that it was an act of war by al-Qaeda and associated groups against the people of the United States.

If that brief had been accepted by the Court, it would be impossible for us to fight this war...

The reason I mention it is because in one of the briefs, you argued that the executive branch doesn't have that option.

I'm pretty sure that in your brief, you argued that the executive branch should not have the ability to hold an enemy combatant indefinitely.