Lindsey Graham

If somebody is starving over there, they are not going to just sit around and starve.

Infrastructure really is important to economic development, particularly on the food side.

I want us as a group, Mr. Chairman, to call our allies and say you need to help too.

If people can produce food in their backyard, they really have absolutely no resilience at all.

If you believe in a strong national security to keep America safe, then you have to be involved in addressing world hunger.

The $5 billion helps, but it is not enough by itself.

The amount of money that will be in this supplemental for food and humanitarian assistance is about $5 billion.

What this does is there’ll be a rallying effect for a while where the country says we’re better than this.

He’s misjudged the passion. You know, he plays the TV game and he went too far here. That rally didn’t help, talking about, you know, primarying Liz. He created a sense of revenge.

He`s misjudged the passion, he plays the TV game and he went too far here. That rally didn`t help talking about primarying Liz [Cheney]. He created a sense of revenge.

Defeating Putin is priceless.

He's misjudged the passion, he plays the TV game and he went too far here. That rally didn't help, talking about primarying Liz [Cheney]. He created a sense of revenge.

Totally. He'll be maybe the best person to have, right? I mean, how can you get at Joe Biden?

We'll actually come out of this thing stronger. Moments like this reset. People will calm down. People will say, 'I don't want to be associated with that.'

Putin must go. If Putin still standing after all this, then the world is going to be a very dark place.

We are going to win in 2022. Roe v. Wade is not going to change the outcome.

You`re singling out a single company because of your political agenda to socialize this country.

Because that means if you are Boeing in South Carolina and you want to do business with the military you cannot give the other side of the story why unionization may hurt productivity and is not the best way for the worker.

Most troubling to me, as a mother of six young children, is the PRO Act's attack on independent workers.

This is not about righting wrongs, because there is a system to do that. This is about getting an outcome you want.

Maybe people are making a different choice. The number of people joining a union in this country is going way down.

What you have done here today is you have tried and convicted Amazon.

Closing off opportunities for people to work in the way that they want and need may increase union dues but it will not help workers and it will not help the economy grow.

Policies like protecting the Right to Organize Act that prioritized union membership over workers' desires would add to inflation, fail to meet many workers' needs, and ultimately lead to a smaller labor force and lower incomes.

The idea that you can only get a government contract if you promise to be neutral is ridiculous.