Do you agree it is now time to change our policy because it is not working? Or do you think it is working?

There are 345.2 million people that participate in some food program because of food insecurity.

The goal is to run this more like a business, we have the former Ambassador to Japan here.

The bottom line is that the bilateral approach needs to be supplemented with something new because it is not working.

The goal here, I guess, is to have the local community feel like the park is an asset.

I think the President said he thought that was a sound approach.

I think now is the time, Mr. Secretary, to label Russia state sponsor of terrorism, because they are.

Would you be willing to entertain a public-private partnership akin to the Global Fund for food security?

Of all the things the Committee could be focusing on, this is sort of top of our list for a good reason.

We need to appropriate money directly to counter the influence of China.

How about this idea. Rather than just interdicting at the border, we go to the source and declare Mexican drug cartels foreign terrorist organizations under U.S. law.

Of all the things the Committee could be focusing on, this is sort of top of our list for a good reason.

I would say our policy is not working.

The goal, of Chris and myself, is to create a public-private relationship where the private sector sort of leads and puts their money where their mouth is.

Haven't we now reached a point where, frankly, we have to understand we are entering a period of geopolitical competition bordering on conflict?

Do you agree with the following statement: that fentanyl coming from Mexico is killing Americans by the tens of thousands?

I think the private sector, both the philanthropic private sector, and even the for-profit private sector would respond very, very well to this.

Do you agree with the following statement: that fentanyl coming from Mexico is killing Americans by the tens of thousands?

What I want to do is create a global food security fund, modeled after the Global Fund, so we can get other countries helping us and helping people who are literally starving.

Senator Menendez and I, and many others have pushed for a $2 million authorization for Taiwan's defense needs.

Our men and women of the State Department, they are heroes in their own way.

If we don't do something, the 345 million can double in the next 4 or 5 years.

More Americans are being poisoned by fentanyl from Mexico in a single year than we lost in the entire Vietnam War.

We need to appropriate money directly to counter the influence of China, but it will not be in a mandatory spending construct.

The proposed bipartisan bill, introduced by Senator Coons and Senator Graham, offers all three.