It does. It matters a lot, because that's the place where the attacks of September 11 were planned; is that correct?

Would you agree with me that if we had such an enduring relationship, it would be a signal to Iran that needs to be sent?

Would you agree that it violates the War Crimes Act and the Detainee Treatment Act that are now U.S. law?

We are a Nation without a jail, and that is not good for us.

The safety of our Air Force members and their families is our number one priority.

That takes us to missile defense and to suppress the Iranian nuclear threat could require some pretty sophisticated military capability.

I think I would echo Secretary Panetta when he was asked a question about this, and he said we are close to being able to strategically defeat al Qaeda.

Do you think it is logical for this country to assume in the future that we are not going to have to use the Army in some kind of role in the future operations in the war on terror?

I just want the country to understand that this is not the Petraeus strategy any longer.

it is critical to have a logistics infrastructure capable of moving DOD's vehicles and assets to and from their reset and storage facilities.

I couldn't agree with you more. I don't think, quite frankly, we are going to be able to sustain our efforts in Afghanistan until we deal with the safe havens.

Would you at least consider that request?