I still don't think we have heard the answer to the question of why does it take 4 years to do this study. The fact is that when this report is available, whatever time, the principal recipient of that report will not be the individual 50 State legislatures, it is going to be us, because in order to implement the recommendations that would allow States to hold the distant seller responsible for collection, we know it is going to require action by the U.S. Congress. We are in session just about all the time. So whatever date we set for this report to be submitted, we will likely be here, or close to being here, to receive it and to commence the process to deal with it. I still have not heard any rationale as to why we should continue beyond the minimal time necessary for the inequity of the Main Street merchant and the vulnerability of State and local governments' capacity to finance their police, fire, and schools that an extended moratorium implies.
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the timeline for a study related to state and local government funding during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Lindsey Graham
Michelle Childs is incredibly qualified. There's no affirmative action component if you pick her.
“Totally support President Trump’s executive order that will allow alternative therapies to be approved by the FDA to treat mental health issues experienced by our veterans and others. This is a very good decision by President Trump…
any Democrat that shuts down FISA at a time of great peril for the United States is making a huge mistake.
Momentum and support continues to grow for our legislation to not only protect, but provide recourse to the victims—many of whom are women and children—of nonconsensual, sexual deepfakes. The DEFIANCE Act gives these victims a voice, and I…





