The best people to know how to allocate needs within South Carolina, I submit, are people in Columbia, people in Spartanburg, and Greenville. I daresay that not many of those folks would spend some of the money that has been spent the way ARC has spent their money. We create these programs, they fit those categories, and then the money is spent that way. What we have to do is be willing to think more creatively and say to the locals: ``You run it, you raised the money.'' Let us not have this pool of money that comes from Washington. I understand that the gentleman from Kentucky will likely tell me that it has been a local decision. I understand that. But it appears to be free money. That is the problem.
Bob Inglis: “The best people to know how to allocate needs within South Carolina, I submit, are people in Columbia, people in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing local control over funding and allocation of resources in South Carolina.
Share
More from Bob Inglis
If 98 doctors prescribe one treatment, and 2 doctors prescribe a different treatment, who are you going to follow?
I, too, believe the best way to address climate change is to first recognize the overwhelming evidence provided by scientists throughout the world that our planet faces severe consequences if we do not take action.
I would ask, second, would it be permissible for me to enter into this record an encouragement of the Centers for Disease Control to consider allocating funds to groups, such as PFOX, that promote abstinence as a means to prevent the…
It is my understanding that any group which is responsible for conduct covered by subsection (b)(1) of the first section of the Hate Crimes Statistics Act would be excluded from the protection of the bill. The language was inserted to…





