I really cannot figure out exactly what the amendment does, to tell the truth. The legal significance of the amendment is an absurdity, really. It is from the Constitution. I just see it as a legal absurdity.
Discussing the legal implications of an amendment during a House debate.
Share
More from Bob Inglis
I rise today to say that setting deadlines for withdrawal from Iraq is unacceptable. I am in agreement with the concept of adding a series of success checkpoints, and I suggested as much in a letter to the President 2 weeks ago. It worked…
In May of 1989, students began a protest for democratic reforms in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. Their movement began modestly, then swelled to thousands as they occupied the square in what they saw as a people's movement. From the flat…
I sincerely hope that this Committee is not beginning and ending its record on climate science in the 112th Congress with this hearing.
I think that term limits, it is wonderful if somebody will apply the limit to themselves, but we need universal limits, I believe, across the board.
Other voices in this conversation
