EPA's analysis that the benefits are between $6 billion and $13 billion and the costs around $4 billion, that analysis is not a first effort by EPA.
the existing standard, the previous standard, the 75 parts per billion standard, was criticized at the time that it was ...
You have made a perfect segue to Dr. Ferkol.
What is the track record of your estimates?
Somebody obviously didn't find the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to be very credible, in ignoring their recomm...
And so the American Thoracic Society, in your view, is also reputable and reliable when it makes a recommendation like t...
So a vulnerable person who goes out on a bad air day and experiences no apparent, immediate ill effects, doesn't feel sh...
So a private citizen listening to this hearing can take comfort that the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee is a re...
And does the harm tend to be cumulative?
So a power plant owner looking at this proposed rule could expect that the improvements in emissions that they would be ...
I do want to, with unanimous consent of all present, put into the record a combination press release and letter issued b...