Let me again say that so many times we rush into things, so many times we do legislation, so many times we promulgate regulation without any scientific knowledge as to will this help the people we are trying to help or will it not? Last October, 333 Members of this House of Representatives, the Senate, the President said, ``We believe that the National Academy of Sciences should do an in-depth study so that when we regulate, we regulate to help, not regulate to harm.'' They also said at that time, we should pay $800,000 of taxpayers' money to do it. All we say now is, ``Let's see what they say,'' so that we do it. Let us not regulate and then see that we have caused more problems than we have cured. Let us regulate with the scientific knowledge before the regulations are written. Again, I would ask all to vote in favor of the legislation and try to help those that we want to protect in the workplace. Vote ``yes'' on this legislation.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of scientific knowledge in regulation during a legislative debate.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
When we were doing that negotiating last year, it was a perfect time. The New York News newspaper had total front page coverage which said, Parents, do you recognize in New York City, 50 percent of your teachers are not qualified? And I…
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…
I offer an amendment to the title. The Clerk read as follows: Amendment to the title offered by Mr. Goodling: Urging the House to support mentoring and enrichment programs that promote and encourage young people to enter mathematics…
First of all, I want to say we are not talking about construction, we are talking about maintenance and renovation. It would really be a joke if we were talking about construction at $1.3 billion. I also want to compliment North Carolina…





