this morning, President Clinton signed an Executive order that would ban Federal contractors from hiring permanent replacement workers. I rise today to express my strong opposition to the President's action, both in terms of what it means for our country's workplace policy, as well as the manner in which it was done. In terms of workplace policy, the President's order will have serious negative implications for our system of collective bargaining. The foundation of that system is a balancing of the interests and risks of labor and management that allows the bargaining process to prod both parties toward a collective agreement on the terms and conditions of employment. A ban on the use of replacement workers will undoubtedly lead to more strikes, and the ripple effects of those strikes will result in lost jobs and lost business opportunities throughout industry. Beyond its policy implications, the legality of the Executive order is also questionable. The Congress has expressed its will with respect to the legality of permanent replacement workers and the President's order runs completely counter to that will. The responsibility for setting employment policy rests in the Congress, not in the White House. I call on President Clinton to reconsider his decision to pursue this dangerous and ill-conceived threat to our national labor policy.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing President Clinton's Executive order banning Federal contractors from hiring permanent replacement workers.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
For 22 years, I tried to get 40 percent of excess spending back to the local districts as far as special ed is concerned. If the majority had done that for all these years, Los Angeles, for instance, would have been getting an extra 100…
I am very proud to be in the well supporting the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter). I am very proud to be here supporting him for the last 4 years. I will tell the minority leader why you are going to bring in 200,000 people from other…
I am reminded each time that we were negotiating that both the President and the Secretaries were governors. Think in terms of being a governor, rather than being a Washington bureaucrat, and you will be offering far better solutions to…
I did not plan to speak on this amendment, but I was listening to the discussion back in my office and I thought, how silly do we think the American people are. I think it was 62 years ago, I am 72 at the present time, when my mother and…





