I am very proud to be in the well supporting the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter). I am very proud to be here supporting him for the last 4 years. I will tell the minority leader why you are going to bring in 200,000 people from other countries. For 20 years I sat here in the minority, and the only thing I ever heard from the majority was quantity, quantity. No quality. No quality. The only thing they ever talked about was quantity. If we can just cover more children, if we can just have more programs, if we just spend more money. Nobody ever went out to see whether they were doing any good, so we spent $140 billion in title I. So what do we have now? Do you close the achievement gap? No, Mr. Minority Leader, you did not close the achievement gap one bit. In fact, it has increased. So for the first time in the last 4 or 5 years we have been talking about quality, not quantity. We have been talking about results, not process.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing education funding and the importance of quality over quantity in programs.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
I think that it has been a slow learning process for the minority, because I think they are at the point now where they realize these programs did not work. Well intended, no question well intended, but they now begin to realize, and we…
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.
I am a little confused as to where the administration stands on school construction. Back in 1995, we had a rescission of the funding that was already appropriated, and then in the President's 1996 budget he put no money in for any kind of…





