Let us target something that is beneficial to the most important students, the most disadvantaged educational students. Let us not give them any more pabulum as they have had in the past. Let us make sure that $50 billion or the $110 billion or $120 billion count for the most disadvantaged education students in this country. Reject this amendment.
Addressing funding for disadvantaged educational students during a House debate.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.
First of all, the church cannot be a fiscal agent. They cannot, in our legislation, be a fiscal agent.
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…
When we were negotiating the 100,000 teachers last year, the first thing the administration said is we have to take about 10 percent off the top, I think they wanted 15 percent, to keep on the Federal level. I said, wait a minute, you are…
Other voices in this conversation
