That is correct. Title I is completely consistent with the policies of the National Labor Relations Act. All the legislation does is give the employer some comfort that it is hiring someone who really wants to work for the employer, and as my amendment points out with particularity, title I in no way infringes on the rights granted by the National Labor Relations Act. I would hope my colleagues on both sides of the aisle support my amendment, which while granting some protection to the employers against clear instances of salting abuses, also makes crystal clear this legislation does not in any way scale back on the rights contained in the National Labor Relations Act. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the consistency of Title I with the National Labor Relations Act during a legislative debate.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
When we were doing that negotiating last year, it was a perfect time. The New York News newspaper had total front page coverage which said, Parents, do you recognize in New York City, 50 percent of your teachers are not qualified? And I…
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.
As a matter of fact, Mr. Speaker, two budgets submitted by the White House in a row had a decrease in funding for special education, 2 years in a row.
how sad I would have been if on my last day, after 26 years in this Congress, I would not have had an opportunity to vote on this legislation. I certainly want to thank the gentleman from Florida (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from…





