That is correct. Title I is completely consistent with the policies of the National Labor Relations Act. All the legislation does is give the employer some comfort that it is hiring someone who really wants to work for the employer, and as my amendment points out with particularity, title I in no way infringes on the rights granted by the National Labor Relations Act. I would hope my colleagues on both sides of the aisle support my amendment, which while granting some protection to the employers against clear instances of salting abuses, also makes crystal clear this legislation does not in any way scale back on the rights contained in the National Labor Relations Act. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
William F. Goodling: “That is correct. Title I is completely consistent with the policies of the National Labor Relations Act. All the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the consistency of Title I with the National Labor Relations Act during a legislative debate.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
I pleaded with the President, and I said, he can talk about class size reduction, but if he does not have a quality teacher to put in that new classroom, I will guarantee it does not matter whether the teacher-to-pupil ratio is 12 to 1, 20…
First of all, the church cannot be a fiscal agent. They cannot, in our legislation, be a fiscal agent.
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…
When we were negotiating the 100,000 teachers last year, the first thing the administration said is we have to take about 10 percent off the top, I think they wanted 15 percent, to keep on the Federal level. I said, wait a minute, you are…





