the rule fails to allow significant amendments. Why the majority party finds it necessary to strangle debate when we have the time to debate the issues honestly and openly, is a question the American people deserve to have answered. I am particularly disappointed that the Rules Committee rejected my amendment to H.R. 811, which like the independent counsel legislation, was intended to further confidence in Government--this time, as it concerns the operations of the White House. The amendment sought to establish an independent inspector general and a chief financial officer within the Executive Office of the President. An internal watchdog, and annual, audited financial statements, would have gone a long ways toward ensuring public confidence in the operations of the White House. Known independently as the Executive Office Accountability Act, this measure has been cosponsored by every Member of the Republican leadership and 15 members of the Government Operations Committee. We could all cite examples of past White House mismanagement and malfeasance in both Republican and Democratic administrations: the misuse of travel resources; the travel office debacle; skirting of procurement laws to buy millions of dollars worth of unnecessary equipment; and retroactive personnel and pay actions. Episodes such as these only fuel the pessimism and mistrust Americans feel toward their Government.
Editor's note · Context
Clinger discusses the need for accountability in the White House and criticizes the rejection of his proposed amendment.
Share
More from William Clinger
many have indicated they would like to be informed as soon as possible in the evaluation process if they had no chance for award in order to save time and expense. We have not heard that firms wish to have their initial proposals, which is…
Let me say I commend the gentleman for the contribution he made to this bill because he did, took a great interest and had a very helpful contribution. We were unfortunately unable to sustain all of his amendments in the conference report…
I served as chairman of the conference on the line-item veto. It was a difficult, contentious, hotly contested conference. We argued and debated over the issues long and hard. It took us a year, yes, it took us longer than any of us would…
to close, I yield myself such time as I may consume, to say to the gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. Tauzin], I think this is a very thoughtful and helpful addition to the debate we are having on this matter. I do think it goes to far…





