to close, I yield myself such time as I may consume, to say to the gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. Tauzin], I think this is a very thoughtful and helpful addition to the debate we are having on this matter. I do think it goes to far. Frankly, there are implications of the amendment that I do not fully understand at this point. I think there may well be, as we proceed to further consider this matter and move to the Senate and so forth, it may well be that something in this nature can be done. I do think, however, that at the moment it does seem to strike me more as a sort of Gramm-Rudman rescission. The gentleman says it is not the same, but it seems to me there are implications of that.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment during a debate on budgetary implications.
Share
More from William Clinger
Mr. Chairman, this bill, the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1995, is an important piece of legislation, which the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Spence], chairman of the Committee on National Security, and I introduced along with…
There is no bar to anybody who is, as my colleague knows, anyone can get in and bid on these Government procurements.
The gentlewoman makes a very, very strong point. This is one way that we can help preserve the industrial base. If we see that shrink dramatically, it would, in fact, jeopardize us in the event we have hostilities somewhere else in the…
Reauthorization, if there are no additional new mandates imposed as a result of a reauthorization of an existing program, it would have no effect at all. It is only where there would be an additional or added mandate that would exceed the…





