The gentlewoman makes a very, very strong point. This is one way that we can help preserve the industrial base. If we see that shrink dramatically, it would, in fact, jeopardize us in the event we have hostilities somewhere else in the world. So it really has national security implications. It has jobs implications, economic implications for this country. And it really will not, in any way, enhance or increase the number of sales. It just makes it more competitive in the world market. That is what we are dealing in. We are dealing in a world market in these areas. I must regretfully oppose the gentlewoman's amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the industrial base and national security during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
To this extent, if the gentleman will yield, the gentleman understands that this is only prospective in its application. In other words, we are not, in effect, looking back at all of the cornerstones of environmental legislation, clean…
Well, I think it bears repeating. The administration in their statement we received tonight supports House passage of H.R. 1670 as reported by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and I think the gentleman from Virginia…
Absolutely, and that is one of the changes that has been made, frankly, since we last considered this measure, the DOD authorization bill. There was a concern that we were eliminating the language which has been relied on so long and…
I think this is a historic piece of legislation. It is going to be the first step in reordering the relationship between Federal and State and local governments. It is going to substantially restructure that relationship and, I think…





