That is absolutely untrue. What we are saying is that the procurement officials, very front and center, they are very much on the front line of the decisions that they make, are going to be given a little more flexibility, a little more discretion, in how they do these things. They are going to be answerable for decisions they make, and, in fact if they exclude people, they have to go on record in writing why and on the basis on which they excluded those people from the competition. So, it is not a nameless, faceless bureaucrat. It is going to be a very visible procurement officer.
Editor's note · Context
Defending the role and accountability of procurement officials in government contracting.
Share
More from William Clinger
It strikes me there are analogies here to the Great Lakes initiative where we have had some indication what the cost might be, but the costs became wildly beyond anybody's wildest dreams what it might actually involve. At any rate, Mr…
I would just question the appropriateness of the inspector general making policy in these kinds of areas. It seems to me it is the policymakers of the Department of Defense who really should be paid attention to in this area.
I served as chairman of the conference on the line-item veto. It was a difficult, contentious, hotly contested conference. We argued and debated over the issues long and hard. It took us a year, yes, it took us longer than any of us would…
I think that for the first time we are really going to have some consideration for what are the compliance costs, what does it cost to carry out the number of the mandates that we have had in the past, but I think that the environmental…





